A Study to assess the knowledge Regarding Diabetic foot Ulcer among Diabetic Clients in a selected Hospital, Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu.

 

P. Tamilselvi1*, Dr. Rajasankar2, Dr. N. Kokilavani3

1Reader, Adhiparasakthi College of Nursing, Melmaruvathur, Kancheepuram District

2Associate Professor, Adhiparasakthi College of Nursing. Melmaruvathur, Kancheepuram District

3Principal, Adhiparasakthi College of Nursing, Melmaruvathur, Kancheepuram District

*Corresponding Author Email: selvitamil79@gmail.com

 

 

ABSTRACT:

A descriptive study to assess the knowledge regarding diabetic foot ulcer among diabetic clients in a selected hospital, Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu. Convenient sampling technique was used to select 100 diabetic patients who were in hospital. Data were gathered through structured knowledge questionnaire .The results mainly found that 56% patients had inadequate level of knowledge,38% had average level of knowledge,6%had an adequate level of knowledge. The Association between knowledge score and demographic variables was assessed by using chi-square. There was significant association between age, sex, marital status and family history of diabetes with knowledge score. The findings revealed that there is need planned teaching programme regarding diabetic ulcer foot.

 

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

People with diabetes have a number of potentially serious health problems that can be cause by the condition, including eye, heart, feet and kidney diseases. One of the most common is diabetes-related foot problems.

 

High glucose levels from diabetes can result in poor circulation to the lower legs and feet. Often, this causes nerve damage, called neuropathy, which can lead to a lack of sensation in the feet, foot ulcers, and in severe cases results in amputation. Fortunately, with conscious treatment of diabetes and good foot care, many of these problems can be avoided or at least treated.

 

Jeewantha M, et al., 2011. Their analytical survey studied the knowledge and practice of diabetic foot care among110 in patients with chronic diabetic ulcers. Results demonstrate a satisfactory knowledge on diabetic foot disease; however their practices of preventive techniques were unsatisfactory.

 

Sheule Begum, et al., 2010 studied the knowledge regarding diabetic foot ulcer among 120 diabetic patients in Bangladesh, the result revealed that around 80% of the patients had an average knowledge and 15 % had an adequate knowledge. The researchers recommended that there is the need of intensive teaching program regarding diabetic foot ulcer and its prevention

 

Son Yong Kim et al., 2008 in their descriptive cross sectional survey studied the knowledge, attitude and practice regarding diabetic foot ulcer among 300 diabetic patients in outpatient department of Metropolitan Administration (BMA) Health Center No. 48, Bangkok, Thailand, the result shown that 54% of the patients had moderately adequate knowledge and attitude. Monthly income, expenditure and family history of diabetes had significant association with knowledge, attitude and practice.

 

33% of the diabetic people are at the risk of developing foot Ulcer. 16% will definitely develop Foot Ulcer. The prevalence of amputation in Type 2 diabetic patients is 3%. 30% of the diabetics get admitted for diabetic foot. And number of days spent by these patients in hospitals, are more than the days spent due to all other complications. Of the total lower limb amputations, 85% are due to Diabetic Foot.

 

India will be the capital of Diabetics in the 2025. Figure will jump 25 million to 57 millions 2025. In India most of the foot problems are associated with Neuropathy & Infective rather than Vascular. The prevalence of foot complications such as Neuropathy is 15%, Peripheral Vascular disease 5% & infections 7.6%. As per our studies Foot Pressure changes occur in 25% of diabetes.  In India, 55% of Foot Ulcers are Neuropathic (nerve involvement), 35% are Neuroischaemic & 10% are Ischaemic (Blood Vessels Involvement)

 

Statement of the Problem:

A descriptive study to assess the knowledge regarding diabetic foot ulcer among diabetic clients in a selected hospital, Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu.

 

Objectives:

·         To assess the knowledge regarding diabetic foot ulcer among diabetic clients

·         To associate the knowledge score with the selected demographic variables of diabetic clients.

 

Research Design:

Descriptive design was used for this study

 

Setting:

The study was conducted in Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Melmaruvathur, Kancheepuram Dist. Tamil Nadu.

 

Population:

The study population comprises of all the Diabetic patients who are attending outpatient department and admitted in medical ward.

 

Sample Size:

100 patients were included as sample

 

Sampling Technique:

A convenient sampling technique was used to select the sample.

 

Criteria for Sample Selection:

Inclusion Criteria:

1.       Patient should have diabetic

2.       Patient who is willing to participate in the study.

3.       Patient who is able to speak or understand Tamil

 

Exclusion Criteria:

1.     Patient with mental disturbances

2.     Patient with allergic history

3.     Patient with depleted illness

 

Development and description of the tool:

Section A               Demographic Variables

Section B               structured knowledge questionnaire

 

Score Interpretation:

The knowledge was measured by multiple choice questions with four options. For best answer score was one and wrong answer score was zero.

                               

Score                      Obtained score

interpretation =    Total score              X100   

                               

The score were interpreted as follows

Below 50%           Inadequate Knowledge

50 -75%                 average Knowledge

Above 75%           adequate knowledge

 

Data Collection:

Considering all the ethical aspects, the study was conducted in Melmaruvathur Adhi Parasakthi Medical College Hospital and Research Institute. Total of 100 samples were interviewed and data were collected.

 

Data Analysis:

Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation was to assess the knowledge, inferential statistics (chi square) was used to associate the level of knowledge with selected demographic variables.

 

RESULT:

 

Table: 1-Diabetic Client’s Knowledge Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcer                                 (No: 100)

Knowledge level score

No

Percentage

Mean

Standard Deviation

Inadequate

 

Average

 

adequate

56

 

38

 

06

56

 

38

 

06

10.3

2.43

 

The table shows that 56% patients have inadequate knowledge, 38% have average knowledge and 6% of the patients have an adequate knowledge. The findings reveal that there is need planned teaching programme.

 

 


Table:2-Frequency and percentage distribution of diabetic clientsN: 100

S. No

 

Variables

Total

Knowledge

Chi-square

Inadequate

Average

Adequate

N

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

1

Age in Years

a. <25

b. 25 to 35

c. 36 to 45

d. 46 to 55

e. >55

 

00

22

28

32

18

 

00

22

28

32

18

 

00

22

28

32

18

 

00

22

28

32

18

 

00

18

07

09

02

 

00

18

07

09

02

 

00

00

01

02

03

 

00

00

01

02

03

 

Chi square=

30.199

S

P**

2

Sex

a. Male 

b. Female

52

48

52

48

52

48

52

48

15

23

15

23

01

05

01

05

Chi square=8.783

S, p**

3

Marital Status

a. Married

b. Unmarried

c. Widowed

d. Widower

d. Separated / divorced

 

38

20

00

30

12

 

38

20

00

30

12

 

38

20

00

30

12

 

38

20

00

30

12

 

24

04

00

08

02

 

24

04

00

08

02

 

04

00

00

02

00

 

04

00

00

02

00

 

Chi square=23.94

S, p**

 

4

Religion

a. Hindu

b. Muslim

c. Christian

d. Others

 

61

17

22

00

 

61

17

22

00

 

61

17

22

00

 

61

17

22

00

 

23

10

05

00

 

23

10

05

00

 

03

01

02

00

 

03

01

02

00

 

Chi square=5.643

NS, p**

 

5

Occupation

a. Unemployed

b. Daily Labor

c. Private employee

d. Government       employee

e. Professionals

 

36

23

14

09

 

18

 

36

23

14

09

 

18

 

36

23

14

09

 

18

 

36

23

14

09

 

18

 

10

12

08

01

 

07

 

10

12

08

01

 

07

 

03

01

01

01

 

00

 

03

01

01

01

 

00

 

Chi square=9.438

NS, p**

 

6

Monthly income of the family (in Rupees )

a. <5000/-

b. 5001 /- to 10000/-

c. 10001/- to 20,000/-

d. >20,000

 

 

13

57

27

03

 

 

13

57

27

03

 

 

13

57

27

03

 

 

13

57

27

03

 

 

03

22

10

03

 

 

03

22

10

03

 

 

00

05

01

00

 

 

00

05

01

00

 

 

Chi square=8.655

NS, p**

 

7

Duration of Illness

a. Less than one year

b. 1 -2 years

c. 2 -3 years

d. 3-4 years

e. 4-5 years

f. >5 years

 

06

19

29

18

21

07

 

06

19

29

18

21

07

 

06

19

29

18

21

07

 

06

19

29

18

21

07

 

00

16

00

00

15

07

 

00

16

00

00

15

07

 

01

03

02

00

00

00

 

01

03

02

00

00

00

 

Chi square=8.655

NS, p**

 

8

Dietary Pattern.

a. Vegetarian

b. Non- Vegetarian

43

57

43

57

43

57

43

57

16

22

16

22

01

05

01

05

Chi square=8.768

NS, p**

9

Domicile

a. Rural

b. Urban

d. Sub- urban

63

22

15

63

22

15

63

22

15

63

22

15

10

17

11

10

17

11

00

05

01

00

05

01

 

Chi square=8.726

NS, p**

10

Family history of Diabetes Mellitus

a. Yes

b. No

c. Unknown

 

 

42

46

12

 

 

42

46

12

 

 

42

46

12

 

 

42

46

12

 

 

14

22

02

 

 

14

22

02

 

 

02

04

00

 

 

02

04

00

 

 

Chi square=9.523

S, p**

 


 

The above table shows that the sample distributions according to the demographic variables.  Among 100 clients, 32% were between 46-55 years in age, 52% of males, 38% were married, 29% are on treatment, 63% were residing at rural area, 46% of clients were not having the family history of diabetes. The same table shows age, sex, marital status and family history of diabetes were highly significant at p 0.05 levels.

 

 

Recommendations:

·         The similar study can be conducted between rural and urban diabetic clients

·         The study can be replicated in different settings

·         The study can be conducted with large sample in community setup.

·         In order to improve the knowledge of the clients the study can be conducted as an interventional study

 

CONCLUSION:

Health education is an important aspect to prevent the disease and promote the health of the individual and society. Awareness can be given through diabetic camps along with implications to the diabetic clients.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

Journals :

1.     Aggarwal.K.K.’’Foot Complications in Diabetes’’. Asian Journal of Diabetology. 13(3). 2002. 4-5

2.     Robert.W.G et al, Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Asian Journal of Diabetology. l2(2). 2002. 4

3.     Ramachandra. “Epidemiology of Diabetes in India”. Journal Association of Physician of India. 3(2). 2005.

4.     Rajesh et.al. “Why should Diabetic patients take care of their Feet”. A Bulletin of the Diabetic Research Centre. 24. (2).  2006. 1-7.

5.     Jinadasa CVM, Jeewantha M. knowledge and Practice of Foot Care in Patients with Chronic Diabetic Ulcers. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health. 3(1) 2011.115- 122.

6.     Wipawee Kong-in. Knowledge and Practice of Prevention of Foot Ulcer Among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. The 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Palliative Care_008.

7.     Son Yong Kim.  Preventive Behaviors Regarding Foot Ulcers in Diabetes Type II Patients. J Health Res 2008, 22(suppl): 21-28.              

 

Books:

1.     Brunner and Suddarth. Text Book of Medical and Surgical Nursing. J.B. Lippincott company. Philadelphia. . 10th edition.2010.1377-1429

2.     Lewis and Heitkempe. Medical and Surgical Nursing Assessment and Management of Clinical Problems.  Mosby. Toronto. 2008.1242-1260

3.     Dr. Shobhana Ravichandran. A hand book on diabetes. Chennai. India. First edition.2004. 2-23.

 

 

 

Received on 17.11.2012          Modified on 08.12.2012

Accepted on 20.01.2013          © A&V Publication all right reserved

Asian J. Nur. Edu. & Research 3(1): Jan.-March 2013; Page 01-04